Five Things to Know about the Supreme Court Case on Texas' Age

  • Bias Rating

    -8% Center

  • Reliability

    20% ReliablePoor

  • Policy Leaning

    -8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

21% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : For more information about the dangers of various methods, you can read our comments to the New York State Attorney General regarding the implementation of the SAFE for Kids Act.
49% : The plaintiff in this case is the Free Speech Coalition, the nonprofit non-partisan trade association for the adult industry, and the Defendant is Texas, represented by Ken Paxton, the state's Attorney General.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link