Hydrogen still holds promise as a fuel
- Bias Rating
36% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
15% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-4% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : Emitting nothing but water vapour as a byproduct, when produced using renewable energy, hydrogen has long held promise as the fuel of the future.60% : Now, with Donald Trump having signed orders to promote fossil fuels on his first day back as US president, critics see hydrogen-powered cars heading down a similar path.
54% : Government subsidies in the region are also going strong.
48% : Not all energy solutions regarded as revolutionary alternatives to fossil fuels have lived up to expectations.
34% : Among a flurry of executive orders on his first day back as US President, Trump suspended federal funding for hydrogen projects pending a comprehensive review.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.