Trump's spending freeze circus won't affect your health coverage or student loans -- probably
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-7% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : "Spending for programs such as Medicaid and SNAP, as well as supports like Head Start, rental assistance, and Pell Grants would also continue, it added.49% : After ostensibly ordering federal agencies to freeze vast swaths of government spending, the White House partially walked back its move in the afternoon, claiming it had only meant to pause a more narrow set of operations for review.
47% : "The memo did state in a footnote that Medicare, Social Security, and "assistance received directly by individuals" would not be affected.
45% : By the afternoon, the White House had issued a clarification, in the form of a Q&A, stating that officials were not ordering an "across the board" pause on federal assistance and that the freeze would be "expressly limited to programs, projects, and activities implicated by the President's Executive Orders, such as ending DEI, the green new deal, and funding nongovernmental organizations that undermine the national interest.
44% : At the same time, some spending for programs such as Medicaid and Head Start appeared to be at least temporarily clogged, as lawmakers, state officials, and reporters scrambled to understand what exactly was going on.
44% : Critically, it did not include a list of specific programs to halt, leading to widespread questions about whether schemes like Medicaid, federal student lending, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program were about to be put on ice -- since all of them fit the technical definition of "federal assistance.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.