The Mystery of Tulsi Gabbard
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
24% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
79% : In August, she endorsed Donald Trump, later saying, "A vote for President Trump is a vote to express our deep love for our country, and our appreciation for our God-given rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution."70% : And in November, a few days after the election, Trump nominated Gabbard to be the next director of National Intelligence.
58% : At the end of that year, after Trump's election, she startled many of her Democratic supporters by meeting with Trump.
40% : Gabbard has long taken an interest in the case of Edward Snowden, a government contractor who leaked classified information in order to sound an alarm about state surveillance; he was charged with violating the Espionage Act, and has lived in exile, in Russia, for more than a decade.
38% : When Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, asked Gabbard what she would do if Trump directed her to withhold funds from the inspector general tasked with overseeing the intelligence community, Gabbard refuted the premise.
22% : (At the time, she was arguing that Trump deserved to be censured for his efforts to pressure Ukraine into announcing an investigation of Joe Biden, but she declined to support his impeachment -- she voted "present," instead of yea or nay.)
21% : But, during her testimony on Thursday, she betrayed no concern over the prospect that Trump might, in his second term, commit another such violation.
12% : In 2019, near the end of her eight years in Congress, Gabbard declared that Trump had "violated public trust."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.