
How the Chicago Bears' offseason road map could start in the middle. Brad Biggs' 10 thoughts from the NFL combine.
- Bias Rating
22% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
22% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : I don't think LSU's Will Campbell will be in play for the Bears at No. 10.52% : The precise order won't be known until next month when the league assigns compensatory picks, but the 10th pick in Round 5 a year ago was No. 145.
49% : He has the right demeanor as the No. 2 behind Caleb Williams and will be challenged to improve himself in the new offense.
43% : Acquiring a defensive end -- free agency is more likely than a trade -- wouldn't preclude Ryan Poles from drafting an edge rusher at No. 10.
39% : Some are of the opinion No. 10 is too early to draft an interior offensive lineman, but if the Bears at least pondered the idea of paying Smith more than $20 million a season to play guard, that can't be too early.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.