What the Supreme Court Said about Dellinger v. Trump in Seila Law v. CFPB

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : In any event, the OSC exercises only limited jurisdiction to enforce certain rules governing Federal Government employers and employees.
32% : [Note, this involves a specific office in the federal government, and not "special counsels" like Robert Mueller appointed to investigate alleged executive branch wrongdoing.] in Dellinger v. Trump,Judge Jackson rejected the Trump Administration's argument that the statutory provision barring the removal of the Special Counsel without cause unconstitutionally constrains the President's authority to remove executive branch officers.
30% : Thus the Court could decide in favor of President Trump without overturning Humphrey's Executor (at least not in this case).
23% : A district court judge has concluded that President Trump cannot remove the head of the Office of Special Counsel without cause.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.