Trump Chased the Chinese Out of the Canal Zone
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
95% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
17% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
69% : Trump was pretty clear yesterday that the days of ignoring that part of the agreement are over.62% : If you remember back a whole month and a half (I know, hilarious, right?), Trump was in full 'I just got this gig and this here Sharpie' bluster and had officially set his eyes on getting the Panama Canal back.
59% : The Strategic Ports Reporting Act, introduced by Senators Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Ted Budd (R-NC), and Rick Scott (R-FL), would require the Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense to develop a comprehensive global mapping of ports considered vital to U.S. military, diplomatic, economic, and resource exploration interests.
47% : Trump has claimed that Carter "foolishly" gave the canal away. Don't forget that Panama was part of the itinerary for Marco's first trip as Secretary of State.
47% : The Chinese are doing their 'save face act' - the sale had nothing to do with Trump, you understand.
38% : " Maybe it was the one-two punch of the Senate moving and Trump's bellicosity, but my money's mostly on Trump.
28% : Trump was tired of Panama feeling froggy. ...
28% : And by 'China,' Trump also meant their surrogates who were, in fact, running ports at both ends of the Canal, contrary to the Panamanian president's protestations to the contrary.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.