The Social Cost of Nullifying the Right to Arms: The Case of Mexico
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : Part III.B describes how the Mexican people have practiced community self-defense, such as by coming together to form community militias for protection from cartels and from corrupt governments allied with the cartels.51% : Contrary to the statute, gun permits are almost never issued, and even then only for .22 caliber handguns.
50% : While the Second Amendment belongs to individuals and includes the right of personal self-defense (such as against a lone burglar or rapist), the American right protects the ability of individuals to come together to defend their communities.
48% : Namely, that a 2005 federal statute, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, jurisdictionally forbids American courts from entertaining lawsuits such as Mexico's.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.