The Detroit News Article RatingMichigan pays residents for blood, urine samples to study chemical exposure
- Bias Rating
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
38% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
20% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
40% : Biomonitoring efforts The state of Michigan has received two tranches of money from the CDC to monitor residents' exposure to toxic chemicals through the MiCheM program.40% : The department also conducted testing in 2003 on dioxin exposure in the Tittabawassee River flood plain, and took up long-term monitoring between 1975 and 2001 to track residents' exposure to polybrominated biphenyl (PBB) flame retardants that had been accidentally mixed with cattle feed.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.