Report Hegseth shared attack plans in 2nd Signal chat sparks critics' fury
- Bias Rating
46% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
5% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : In a March memo, Joe Kasper, Hegseth's chief of staff, mentioned the investigation into the leaks: "Recent unauthorized disclosures of national security information involving sensitive communications with principals within the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) demand immediate and thorough investigation.51% : Newsweek reached out to the Department of Defense via email for comment on Sunday.
50% : According to Politico, citing a defense official, the investigation is focused on leaks pertaining to military plans for a second aircraft carrier headed to the Red Sea, the Panama Canal, pausing intelligence collection to Ukraine amid its ongoing war with Russia and a visit to the Pentagon from billionaire Elon Musk who leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
47% : His personal phone assuredly targeted by foreign adversaries.
39% : Details of U.S. military operations are not supposed to be conducted over publicly available platforms such as Signal, and a number of security experts have said the chat group could have violated the Espionage Act.
35% : Officials on the chat group faced bipartisan criticism including a lawsuit from nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight, which alleged breaches of the Federal Records Act and the Administrative Procedure Act by conducting government business on a platform which erases communications.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.