South Carolina Says PFAS-Contaminated Farmland Should Be Superfund Site
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-19% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
68% : President Trump has declared the program, and clean air and water generally, a priority.49% : It also reduces the use of synthetic fertilizers made from fossil fuels.
45% : Christopher Higgins, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and an early researcher of contaminants in sewage sludge, said there wasn't yet an established, cost-effective way of cleaning up such a vast area of farmland.
39% : Kim Weatherford, who lives 12 miles from the Galey & Lord site with her husband and son, learned there was a problem with her well in July 2021 when state environmental officials came to test her water.
28% : Cities and states across the country, including South Carolina, have sued PFAS manufacturers accusing them of causing environmental contamination and misleading the public by denying that PFAS presented harm to human health.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.