
Harvard elitism meets Donald Trump
- Bias Rating
28% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
64% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-68% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
5% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : It would be wholly incompatible with the concepts underlying tax exemption to grant tax-exempt status to racially discriminatory private educational entities.54% : Oil was found on a Wyoming rancher's land.
54% : Brief for University Respondents in No. 21-707, at 39.
53% : With any luck, Harvard will soon have to get along without tax exempt status.
51% : The IRS revoked that tax-exempt status and the Supreme Court upheld the IRS ruling: The IRS's 1970 interpretation of § 501(c)(3) was correct.
44% : Whatever may be the rationale for such private schools' policies, racial discrimination in education is contrary to public policy.
35% : Trump isn't telling Harvard what or how to teach.
6% : Within hours, President Trump, being Donald Trump, froze $2.2 billion in grants and some $60 million in contracts.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.