Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
The Stanford Daily Article Rating

Levin abstains from signing letter opposing Trump administration "interference" in higher education

Apr 23, 2025 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    14% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    75% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    34% Somewhat Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -59% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

23% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

75% : The AAC&U's letter, entitled "A Call for Constructive Engagement," emphasized the importance of higher education as a cornerstone of innovation, professional development and research and "economic and cultural vitality.
49% : The presidents of over 180 U.S. colleges and universities signed the letter, which opposed the "coercive use of public research funding" and promoted a commitment an "exchange of ideas and opinions across a full range of viewpoints without fear of retribution, censorship, or deportation," the letter wrote.
40% : Mandarava Kaiya Jamyangling-Kawaguchi '27 said the University was inconsistent in releasing public statements, citing Stanford's absence from the letter in the context of its public support for Harvard last week.
37% : University president Jonathan Levin '94, alongside other members of University leadership, elected not to sign a letter published by the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) this Tuesday condemning "government overreach and political interference" in higher education.
36% : Jack Correy '27 shared Jamyangling-Kawaguchi's sentiments, saying he was "disappointed" by the University's inaction and that it was "absurd" to maintain institutional neutrality at a time when higher education is under federal attack.
35% : "You're not going to have an institution if [Trump] keeps getting his way," Correy said. Juhae Song '28 believes that institutional silence is not politically neutral but "politically suppressive and unsupportive of students who just want to be able to learn."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link