Israel Struck Syria Again, Injuring 6 - Deafening Silence From The UN Continues | From the Trenches World Report
- Bias Rating
62% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
62% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : The SOHR has also claimed that the T-4 airbase is used by Iran to develop drones; this is again stated without any evidence.41% : Yet instead of striking targets confirmed as belonging to Iran or its allied militias, much more complicated missions are more common in Syria's West.
39% : If the airstrikes of Israel were all about targeting Iran and its "foreign fighters", it would make much more sense to strike them frequently where air defenses do not exist.
37% : Regarding the frequent attacks by Israel, Iran's Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Majid Takht Ravanchi, said "these attacks and provocative practices represent an outrageous violation of international rights and they endanger regional and international peace and security".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.