'Not all is lost' in climate change fight after Supreme Court limits EPA's regulatory power

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : That's the narrow focus of the opinion, but I think this has broad implications for the balance of powers within our government, and the ability of the executive branch to engage in regulation pursuant to legislation.
51% : The Supreme Court Thursday issued a ruling limiting the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate carbon emissions from power plants.
48% : "But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme. ...
40% : "Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible 'solution to the crisis of the day,'" Chief Justice John Roberts, representing the conservative-majority opinion, wrote.
38% : So what the court has done [Thursday] is say that the EPA cannot do certain kinds of regulation.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.