Thank you for following The Conversation. You will receive email notifications for this source. To make changes to this, please visit your account.
You need to upgrade in order to follow more news source and receive email notifications about new articles and ratings, as your subscription allows only source. To change which news sources you follow, please visit your account.
The Supreme Court has curtailed EPA's power to regulate carbon pollution - and sent a warning to other regulators
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
53% : Market conditions are shifting electricity production away from coal and toward cleaner, more cost-effective sources like wind and solar. 49% : Coal companies and Republican-led states contended that the changes the agency envisioned exceeded its authority. 49% : As Roberts writes: "[T]he only interpretive question before us, and the only one we answer, is ... whether the 'best system of emission reduction' identified by EPA in the Clean Power Plan was within the authority" of section 111 (d) of the Clean Air Act. 41% : A rebuke to EPA
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
The Conversation