JURISTPlanned Parenthood seeks a stay of Arizona ruling allowing 1901 abortion ban to take effect
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
68% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
4% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : Planned Parenthood filed an emergency motion to stay the ruling, pending the organization's appeal of the same ruling.39% : Planned Parenthood of Arizona Monday asked an Arizona state judge to stay a September 23 ruling which would allow a 1901 abortion ban to go into effect.
38% : Planned Parenthood claims the court's September 23 ruling caused confusion by allowing conflicting laws to take effect.
36% : In their motion to stay, Planned Parenthood argues that the two laws-the 1901 ban and the 15-week ban-present a confusing legal challenge for abortion providers to navigate.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.