SCOTUS Hears First Arguments In Affirmative Action Cases

  • Bias Rating

    -2% Center

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -48% Medium Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

66% : The court will judge whether educational diversity is a compelling interest and whether affirmative action is an effective process to promote diversity.
65% : Affirmative action was first used following the desegregation of schools in order to create more diverse classes and promote equal opportunity.
57% : Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina could have a large impact on the use of affirmative action policies in public universities.
38% : With the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority, there is uncertaintly about the fate of affirmative action.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link