
BBC slated for Brexit anniversary coverage featuring 'insulting' Radio 4 interview
- Bias Rating
-96% Very Liberal
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-96% Very Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
73% : Hannan told Radio 4 it "makes no sense to say there is a big negative effect from Brexit" and tried to argue Brexit enabled the UK to rollout the Covid vaccine faster.67% : "This is being done in order to whitewash the massive and corrupt blunder of Brexit.
66% : READ MORE: Greenpeace activists occupy Shell vessel heading for North Sea "As the IMF came out and said this morning, we are doing the worst of the lot and the reason for that is largely down to Brexit.
66% : He said: "To have two Brexiteers debating Brexit whilst excluding any voice that reflected the current reality of a sizeable majority against Brexit in all but a handful of places throughout the entire UK is not just wrong - it is wilfully, deliberately and insultingly wrong.
60% : The interview on Tuesday's Today programme - presented by Justin Webb - involved Tory peer Daniel Hannan and Tory MP Theresa Villiers discussing the impact Brexit has had on the economy after the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said the UK will perform worse than other advanced economies, including Russia, in 2023.
58% : READ MORE: Labour and Tories 'conspiracy of silence' over Brexit condemned by SNP "It beggars belief that given the current situation Labour is still parroting impossible nonsense about 'making Brexit work' but of course it is only able to get away with that because the BBC and much of the media are complicit in the deceit.
57% : "We've made everything more difficult [with Brexit].
56% : Meanwhile, Villiers argued there "was a lot of good news about the economy" to try and deflect accusations Brexit had largely contributed to its downfall.
54% : It's not just on Brexit.
51% : "It's not the anniversary of Brexit, strictly speaking, it's the anniversary of the very contentious Trade and Cooperation Agreement that Johnson and co reached, on the back of which comes the Northern Ireland Protocol.
50% : There was also some analysis from the BBC's Europe Editor on how the EU viewed Brexit and Professor John Curtice covered public opinion on the UK leaving the EU.
49% : The segment was widely slated with many deeming it "incredible" there was no Remainer involved as both Villiers and Hannan were given several minutes to argue that Brexit had not damaged the economy with no voice from the other side challenging them.
49% : It comes after The National commissioned a poll showing the majority of Scots do not think the BBC has done a good job of reporting on the impacts of Brexit.
44% : It has also emerged Radio 4 will be hosting a special debate this evening on Brexit with a panel involving Brexiteers Claire Fox and Jacob Rees-Mogg, ex-Labour spin doctor Alistair Campbell and Tony Danker, director-general of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI).
40% : " Media and propaganda expert Dr Emma Briant said the interview was an example of the BBC helping to cover up the "recklessness" of Brexit.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.