Will anybody stop that Trump judge from banning abortion pills?

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : But five of the current justices have shown an extraordinary willingness to bend the law in order to restrict access to abortion.
44% : If you've followed the fight over where and whether abortion should remain legal in the United States, you've probably heard the name "Matthew Kacsmaryk."
43% : If the federal courts could be trusted to apply the law in a fair and non-partisan manner, even when hot-button issues like abortion are at stake, then we could expect a higher court to step in almost immediately to quash a decision seeking to ban mifepristone.
37% : As attorney Adam Unikowsky, a former law clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, writes in a scathing prebuttal of Kacsmaryk's expected decision, "if the subject matter of this case were anything other than abortion, the plaintiffs would have no chance of succeeding in the Supreme Court."
36% :Simply put, this court is not where you want to be if you are trying to block a trial judge's decision restricting abortion.
33% : In a concurring opinion, Kavanaugh added that his Court "must scrupulously adhere to the Constitution's neutral position on the issue of abortion."
28% : Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion declared that "it is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.