Is Anyone in Beijing Listening to Europe?
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-50% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
52% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : If that is the case, then it is important that the European Union is clear about what it wants China to do, and that this is viable.56% : The European Union is aligning with the United States on its diagnosis and prescriptions concerning the China challenge.
55% : China is hoping for a European security decoupling from the U.S. "No matter how the situation may evolve, China all along sees the European Union as a comprehensive strategic partner and supports European integration," China's newly appointed Foreign Minister Qin Gang said in March.
54% : The European Union should therefore choose its aims carefully.
53% : The European Union needs to act now, and von der Leyen offered several keys, including: making better use of existing EU tools such as the recent anti-coercion instrument (ACI), the foreign direct investment screening mechanism, and foreign subsidies regulation; developing new tools to assist sensitive industries and technologies (quantum computing, AI, biotech, etc.); aligning with partners such as Australia, New Zealand, India, Japan, the G-7, the G-20, Mercosur, and others to avoid the "divide and conquer" tactics often used by China in the past (for example: For several years, China used the 17+1 group to attempt a direct dialogue with Eastern and Central European countries, outside of the EU framework; the platform has now become almost dormant).
44% : Still, mature foreign policies can and should walk the security talk and chew the diplomatic gum at the same time, keeping China's market open at a time of economic turbulence and protectionism, and engaging China in serious security and political talks to avoid the worst and maintain a modicum of stability in world politics.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.