Here's why Biden's policy response to the end of Title 42 falls short - The Boston Globe

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : The Biden administration has had enough time to plan and coordinate an improved and humane response for those seeking asylum at the border.
53% : For instance, the American Immigration Council recently proposed in a comprehensive report a blueprint to overhaul the country's asylum system, using a "humane and consistent approach to humanitarian protection and border management."
52% :The recommendations, some of which involve action from Congress, range from the elementary -- expand the capacity of the US Customs and Border Protection agency to process asylum seekers at ports of entry and clear immigration court asylum backlogs; to the truly unexplored -- fund a right to an attorney in immigration court and create a national center for migrant coordination that would bring together federal, state, and local resources and stakeholders to support the integration of migrants into communities once they've been allowed in the country.
44% : Border officials are now instructed to turn away anyone seeking asylum who didn't first apply online or seek protection in a country they traveled through.
37% : Asylum is granted for people who can show they're fleeing their countries because they fear persecution, or because their lives are threatened by violence, political instability, or human rights abuses.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.