Supreme Court Guts Clean Water Act
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
28% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : "I do not see the Supreme Court's decision as an imminent threat to environmental regulations adopted in other contexts," Minoli said.33% : Harvard Law professor Richard J. Lazarus is scathing:Justice Antonin Scalia died more than seven years ago, but the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agencyon Thursday shows that this is the "Scalia Court" far more so than when he was alive.
26% : The ruling arrives almost a year after the court's conservative majority made the worst fears of environmentalists a reality in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, which severely curtailed the ability of the nation's environmental laws to protect public health and welfare.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.