Supreme Court Gets Rid Of Affirmative Action In College Admissions
- Bias Rating
2% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-13% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
74% :Affirmative action was first established in a 1965 executive order that told employers to "take affirmative action to ensure that equal opportunity is provided in all aspects of their employment."56% : The Supreme Court agreed to take up the Harvard and UNC cases in January 2022 after lower courts sided with the schools and upheld affirmative action, prompting SFFA to appeal the case to the high court.
51% : The Supreme Court then sanctioned affirmative action for university admissions in 1978 -- though it ruled schools could not use racial quotas for admissions -- and affirmed the practice in subsequent rulings in 2003 and 2016, though it struck down a "point system" at the University of Michigan that automatically gave applications from underrepresented racial minorities enough points to virtually guarantee admission.
50% : Ultimately, however, the Associated Press notes efforts in states where affirmative action had already been eliminated have still not been able to fully make up for taking race into account in admissions, and it remains to be seen whether efforts will become more successful if affirmative action is now overturned on a national level.
49% : University of Maryland education professor Julie J. Park told Axios a ruling overturning affirmative action action could also lead to standardized testing getting killed as an admissions requirement -- as tests like the SAT historically benefit higher-income students -- and the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) issued guidance that recommends steps like appointing a review team to create strategies on how to comply with the ruling.
48% : Colleges and universities can no longer use race as a factor in their college admissions, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday, striking down the decades-long practice of affirmative action and upending schools' admission tactics -- which they warn could make future student bodies significantly less diverse.
46% : Explainer: What happens if the US Supreme Court bans affirmative action?
43% : Universities have warned that getting rid of affirmative action would significantly impact the diversity of their student bodies, with Harvard arguing in court briefs that taking race out of its admissions process would reduce enrollment of Black students at the school from 14% to 6% of its student body, and Hispanic enrollment from 14% to 9%.
31% : Supreme Court Justices Signal Willingness To End Affirmative Action (Forbes)Affirmative Action Could Soon Be Overturned As Supreme Court Takes Up Harvard And UNC Cases (Forbes)
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.