The Supreme Court just made me a second-class citizen

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

60% : It is about same-sex couples' rights to participate equally in the free market.
54% : Plenty of web designers will be happy to serve same-sex couples.
52% : If the shoe was on the other foot, the ADF would no doubt sue for religious discrimination under the First Amendment and/or the Civil Rights Act.
48% : While looking at the First Amendment, these reactionary extremists in judicial robes ignored the promise of the Fourteenth Amendment, which declares all Americans should enjoy equal protection under the law.
46% : In a 6-3 decision split along party lines, this Republican Supreme Court today ruled that it is lawful for Christian businessowners to discriminate against same-sex couples.
42% : It is inconceivable that this Court would find the same First Amendment it found protects a religious person's right to discriminate against same-sex couples also protects a gay couple's right to "sincerely held beliefs" not to serve those they may deeply feel are hateful bigots for opposing their own equality under law.
37% : As a writer and journalist, I believe very strongly in the sanctity of the First Amendment.
32% : Believing that same-sex marriages are "false," she sued, alleging that Colorado's anti-discrimination law violated her First Amendment rights by compelling her to produce speech which contradicts her sincerely held religious beliefs.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.