BREAKING: Liberal Heads Explode as Supreme Court Makes Massive Ruling in Defense of Religious Rights

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% :The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that Smith was protected by the First Amendment, stating in the ruling, "The First Amendment's protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy.""In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance," the ruling added.
47% : "Consistent with the First Amendment, the Nation's answer is tolerance, not coercion."
46% :"The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.
46% :This ruling harkens back to the 2017 Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case, in which cake artist Jack Phillips was found to have violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act by refusing to create a cake to celebrate a same-sex marriage.
45% : Colorado cannot deny that promise consistent with the First Amendment."
44% : On Friday, the Supreme Court of the United States made a historic ruling in favor of a Colorado graphic designer who did not want to create wedding websites for same-sex couples.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.