Biden's extreme judicial nominee cannot reach the bench
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
52% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Her attacks on the First Amendment to the Constitution are far outside the mainstream and have been rejected by many courts.57% : The sharply worded Supreme Court unanimous opinion labeled her arguments "untenable" and "hard to square with the text of the First Amendment, which gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations."
55% : The U.S. Supreme Court and other federal judges voted against AliKhan's extreme legal theories about the First Amendment.
53% : AliKhan's narrow views on religious liberty would have segregated First Amendment protections to the walls of a church or a temple, and as the court said, "would also run counter to the charitable practices -- and in many cases, teachings -- of diverse religious traditions."
43% : Her narrow views and poor legal analysis threatened the religious liberty rights of a minority faith, and with it, is an attack on diversity in our country.
41% : Her brief took aim at the ministerial exception, which is a religious employer's First Amendment right to make decisions about hiring and firing ministers without government interference.
38% : She opposed the right to assemble for worship, the right of religious organizations to choose teachers of faith and the right of faith-based groups to choose how to form without government interference.
35% : AliKhan's views were also too extreme again for the D.C. Court of Appeals when she opposed the religious liberty rights of Sikhs to build a temple in the nation's capital.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.