Hong Kong's top court rules in favour of legal recognition for same-sex couples
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Activists hope the Hong Kong ruling could also encourage further acceptance of same-sex marriage across Asia, where it is legal only in Taiwan and Nepal.57% :Leung urged to government to note the popular support of same-sex marriage, and "work proactively with stakeholders to formulate a robust legal framework ... as soon as practicable".
55% :"First, such recognition is required to meet basic social needs similar to those experienced by different-sex couples in stable relationships," they said.
53% : The ruling is the first time the court of final appeal has directly addressed same-sex marriage.
47% : Justices Joseph Fok, R A V Ribeiro and Patrick Keane said the need for same-sex couples to have access to legal recognition of their relationship had been "compellingly advocated".
46% : The ruling said Hong Kong's government was "in violation of its positive obligations" under the bill of rights to provide a legal framework to recognise same-sex couples outside the institution of marriage, and gave it two years to establish a system.
45% : Judges call for alternative framework to marriage in partial victory for city's LGBTQ+ communityHong Kong must provide an alternative to marriage in order to legally recognise the rights of same-sex couples, the city's highest court has declared, opening the way for civil unions.
45% : Homosexuality was decriminalised in 1991 and legal challenges have pushed an otherwise unenthusiastic government to make improvements in some rights for same-sex couples.
44% : Recent polling has found support for same-sex marriage has grown from 38% to more than 60% in a decade, however activism of any kind has become increasingly difficult under the government's security crackdown after the 2018 pro-democracy protests.
43% : However, it rejected appeals against current laws which restrict marriage to heterosexual couples and refuse to recognise overseas same-sex marriages, despite majority support among the population.
41% :"As long as the exclusion from marriage remains, same-sex couples and their families are denied the same respect and protections as their neighbours."
39% : Sham, who is in prison, had argued that by denying same-sex couples the right to marry, failing to provide an alternative legal recognition of their relationship, and refusing to recognise overseas marriages went against provisions in Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the basic law, and its bill of rights.
34% : "Secondly, the absence of legal recognition has been seen to be essentially discriminatory and demeaning to same-sex couples."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.