Supreme Court Considers Constitutional Limitations on Federal Taxing Power
- Bias Rating
72% Very Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : The amendment, ratified in 1913, states: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."That's because "a broad ruling could destabilize our tax system, enrich many profitable corporations, and widen existing economic and racial inequalities."Since the 1960s, corporations have been able to move income across borders to avoid taxation.44% : "Mr. Grossman added that "the government's position would make a hash of existing law and cause enormous confusion with respect to how our tax system functions.
43% : The Congressional Budget Office estimated in 2018 that the law would lead corporations to have a one-time tax liability of $347 billion.
42% : "Picking up on a line of questioning begun by Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch asked, "If the court were to hold that the only realization requirement is some realization somewhere along the chain by a corporation antecedent to the taxpayer, what would be the consequences of a holding like that?"Mr. Grossman responded, "The consequences would be to open the door to taxation of practically everything.
41% : If the law is erased, "the floodgates to offshore tax dodging" could be opened "on a scale never seen before," the group said in recent commentary.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.