U.S. Supreme Court leaves Illinois assault weapons ban in place during appeals proceedings
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
14% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-35% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : On Nov. 3, a three-judge appeals panel from that court - composed of Judges Frank H. Easterbrook, Diane P. Wood, and Michael B. Brennan - ruled 2-1 to uphold the ban, in part on the grounds that other constitutional rights have limits under the law, and the Second Amendment is not different.46% : Bevis and the National Association for Gun Rights filed their challenge shortly after the ban was enacted and asked a federal district court to block the law.
45% : People who lawfully had assault weapons before the law was passed can keep them, but must submit an affidavit to state police by Jan. 1.
42% : The state officials also contested Bevis' warnings about the negative impacts of the law on his business and the gun store has remained operational.
36% : "Government may punish a deliberately false fire alarm; it may condition free assembly on the issuance of a permit; it may require voters to present a valid identification card; and it may punish child abuse even if it is done in the name of religion.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.