Swing State's Supreme Court Rejects Bid To Kick Trump Off Primary Ballot
- Bias Rating
84% Very Conservative
- Reliability
95% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
98% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
23% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : One of the Michigan Supreme Court justices, Elizabeth Welch, wrote in an opinion that she would "affirm" part of the lower-court ruling "which still allows appellants to renew their legal efforts as to the Michigan general election later in 2024 should Trump become the Republican nominee for President of the United States or seek such office as an independent candidate.43% : "The Michigan Supreme Court has strongly and rightfully denied the Desperate Democrat attempt to take the leading Candidate in the 2024 Presidential Election, me, off the ballot in the Great State of Michigan," Trump said in post to Truth Social on Wednesday.
40% : A brief order said the Michigan justices "are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court," rejecting the challenge from Free Speech For The People that seeks to disqualify Trump based on the view that he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021.
37% : "This pathetic gambit to rig the Election has failed all across the Country, including in States that have historically leaned heavily toward the Democrats.
34% : The application sought to challenge the Michigan Court of Appeals decision that left the issue of primary ballot access up to the Republican Party but declined to rule on whether Trump is qualified to be on the general election ballot because he has not won the GOP nomination.
32% : "Other Section 3 legal challenges against Trump have been filed in other states.
32% : Only the Colorado case has resulted in Trump being kicked off the primary ballot.
26% : "Trump led a rebellion and insurrection against the Constitution when he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election and he is disqualified from ever seeking or holding public office again.
23% : The Michigan Supreme Court refused a liberal group's effort to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential primary ballot on Wednesday, roughly a week after Colorado's high court ruled against the former president in a similar case.
23% : "Free Speech For The People, the left-wing organization that brought the lawsuit with election lawyer Mark Brewer of Goodman Acker P.C. on behalf of a group of voters, signaled that it will not back down in its legal endeavors to remove Trump from the ballot in Michigan and in other states.
22% : "The decision isn't binding on any court outside Michigan and we continue our current and planned legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against Donald Trump," said Free Speech For People legal director Ron Fein.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.