The simple reform Congress can make to move millions from welfare to...
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
10% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : They could use federal workforce-development funding to create a truly integrated one-stop shop like Utah's.58% : Since 1997, Utah has used federal workforce-development funding to build a system that's integrated with welfare.
52% : If you're a Utah resident applying for unemployment insurance, food stamps, Medicaid or cash welfare, you have to go through the state's Department of Workforce Services.
49% : The more than 40 million Americans on food stamps and 80 million on Medicaid typically aren't connected to workforce development, dwarfing the number who find such opportunities on their own.
38% : Yet in 1998, Congress banned other states from taking this road, making workforce programs far less effective while trapping more people in government dependence.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.