Fox News Insists Trump Immunity Hearing Went Fine For Dear Leader Trump, Just Fine! (It Was Disaster)
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-47% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-7% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Twitter legal expert Asha Rangappa finds this amateur analysis of the Trump lawyer's claims and gives it her stamp of approval:"Apparently it means he could invite Trump to the White House [for] a pardon, give it to him, then murder him, immediately resign to avoid impeachment & conviction thereby insuring his immunity and a Harris POTUS," says somebody on Twitter.42% : "This is exactly what Trump is arguing would be completely legitimate and above the law," replies Rangappa.
41% : After the hearing, Trump came out and continued insisting he has super secret special wizard immunity for any crimes he committed in office: "You can't have a president without immunity," he said.
35% : But we guess by the same logic, Joe Biden could do SEAL Team Six to Trump and get off scot-free as long as the Senate doesn't convict, correct?
32% : Trump also threatened that there would be "bedlam in the country" if he lost the appeal -- he wishes, but we're highly skeptical -- and refused to commit to telling his supporters not to commit acts of violence if such came to pass.
26% : Though the ultimate answer to the question will likely come from the illegitimate Republican hack Supreme Court, which may or may not rule with integrity, if the three-judge panel from the DC appeals court is any indication, SCOTUS may have a hard time not laughing Trump out of the room.
26% : Bradley Moss questions whether the DC Circuit would grant Trump an en banc review (all the court, not just a three-judge panel), or send him straight to SCOTUS.
25% : Sauer ultimately conceded that, according to the legal philosophy he just made up, a president could be prosecuted for actions he was impeached and convicted for, which kind of fucks up their argument about how former presidents can't ever be put on trial for "official duties," doesn't it?Listen to this dipshit (this is the SEAL Team 6 question and so much more):Do you see how they're ass-to-mouth-ing themselves in circles here trying to save Donald Trump from the consequences of his actions?
24% : And if presidents have absolute immunity, could Joe Biden order SEAL Team Six to assassinate Trump right now?
21% : In another show of legal feats of strength, a different dipshit Trump lawyer, John Lauro, argued after the hearing that if Trump is not eternally immune, then Joe Biden could be prosecuted "for trying to stop this man from becoming the next president of the United States.
19% : Because for Donald Trump, there is no line between "job" and "crime," and there never has been.
18% : Trump is always saying he was TOTALLY EXONERATED in his impeachments because the rectum-sucking Republicans in the Senate didn't convict him.
8% : "To which we reply: only if Congress impeaches and convicts him for it, you babbling fuckwit.Most people seem to think -- contra the Fox News gaslighting above -- that today went very poorly for Trump, and that this appeals court will affirm the ruling of Judge Tanya Chutkan that Trump is actually not the second coming of Christ or the king of Earth, and can be prosecuted for trying to OVERTHROW THE FUCKING REPUBLIC.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.