The Christian Science Monitor Article RatingSupreme Court agrees to hear Trump's bid for legal immunity
- Bias Rating
-4% Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-48% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-22% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
83% : Trump wrote on Truth Social that legal scholars "are extremely thankful" the court stepped in to decide on immunity.44% : A panel of appellate judges in Washington ruled earlier in February that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who would preside over the election interference trial, was right to say that the case could proceed and that Trump could be prosecuted for actions undertaken while in the White House and in the run-up to Jan. 6, 2021, when a mob of his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol.
43% : During arguments on Feb. 8, the court seemed likely to side with Trump.
40% : The case could upend a charge prosecutors have brought against more than 300 people, including Trump.
36% : If Trump were to be elected with the case pending, he could presumably use his authority as head of the executive branch to order the Justice Department to dismiss it or could potentially seek to pardon himself.
29% : Prosecutors are looking to bring Trump to trial this year while defense lawyers have been seeking delays in his criminal cases.
29% : The issue reached the high court because the appeals court refused to grant the delay that Trump had sought.
4% : "Trump's lawyers have cast the prosecution in partisan terms, telling the justices that "a months-long criminal trial of President Trump at the height of election season will radically disrupt President Trump's ability to campaign against President Biden -- which appears to be the whole point of the Special Counsel's persistent demands for expedition.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.