Abortion backers at Supreme Court are aiming for Roe v. Wade 'Part 2' in Texas, Stephen Miller warns
- Bias Rating
72% Very Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
92% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Some conservatives have opposed the law, suggesting that liberals might use a similar strategy against free speech or gun rights.51% : The progressive Left does not need permission from us or anybody else to use civil enforcement statutes that have been around for most of our country's history," Miller responded.
50% : He said the rationale for combatting abortion through social action is "especially compelling" because abortion does "permanent irrecoverable irreversible damage."
45% : He also argued that abortion does not enjoy the same status under the Constitution as rights like free speech or gun ownership.
43% : A lawyer and a former advisor to President Trump, working with America First Legal, argued that the cases center on the question of whether or not Texans have the democratic right to make their own laws and warned that the Department of Justice and abortion activists are aiming to bring about a monumental change in the law that would equate to Roe v. Wade "part 2."
43% : "What the advocates and the administration are seeking is to prevent state courts from even docketing cases or adjudicating cases and letting parties litigate the merits of their claims and their defenses under the guise of it all being contrary to a supposed concrete right to abortion."
38% : Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher argued that Texas had "successfully nullified [the Supreme] Court's decisions within its borders" by circumventing Roe v. Wade and making "abortion effectively unavailable in Texas after roughly six weeks of pregnancy."
27% : MCAULIFFE WARNS AGAINST YOUNGKIN'S 'FAR-RIGHT SOCIAL AGENDA' ON ABORTION, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 'BOOK BANNING'"
24% : Yet Miller argued that civil actions inhabit "a wholly separate legal sphere" from criminal actions, and that Roe v. Wade only prevented states from enforcing limits on abortion in the criminal sphere.
22% : The Texas law, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in May, effectively prohibits abortion at around six weeks and before many women know they're pregnant.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.