Verdict Article Rating

A Constitutional Republic Demands a Constrained Judiciary: Judicial Overreach in "Vacating" Biden's Loan Forgiveness Program

Nov 15, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    12% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    4% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    6% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

68% : A federal district judge -- Mark Pittman, a Trump appointee to the Northern District of Texas -- has dashed the hopes and upended the plans of tens of millions of student loan borrowers nationwide who have either been approved, or were about to be approved, for debt relief under the Biden administration's loan forgiveness program.
52% : by the President as 'over'" in remarks during a television interview aired "weeks before the [DOE] program" was officially launched; and the observation that the Education Department's reliance on a "rarely invoked statutory provision" warranted enough "skepticism" to justify finding it beyond the agency's delegated power in light of this past June's Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Authority, requiring that some delegations -- those raising "major questions" -- must be not only clear but clairvoyant, specific enough to spell out in advance the precise program an agency has put in place pursuant to the law Congress enacted.
48% : All that remained was a possible claim that, although the plaintiffs had been denied nothing by way of process to which they could claim any entitlement, and although the law that made that fact crystal clear was perfectly constitutional, perhaps neither that law nor any other gave the Department of Education the statutory authority to forgive student debt at all?
33% : The sole complaint of these plaintiffs -- one of whom, Myra Brown, was ineligible for $20,000 in loan forgiveness under the debt relief program she challenged because her student loans are all commercially held and the other of whom, Alexander Taylor, was ineligible for $10,000 of such loan forgiveness because he hadn't received a Pell grant -- was that they'd been unable, because of the procedure by which DOE promulgated the program, to argue for more generous eligibility criteria, criteria that might have forgiven $20,000 of student debt owed by each.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link