Air Force disciplines 15 guardsmen over Discord leaks
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-43% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : Riley "received administrative action and was relieved of command for cause," the officials said.51% : Another individual was Col. Enrique Dovalo, head of the 102d Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Group, who "received administrative action for concerns with unit culture and compliance with policies and standards.
45% : Air National Guard leaders took disciplinary and other administrative actions against the 15 individuals between Sept. 7 and Dec. 2, with some removed from their positions and some receiving administrative action known as nonjudicial punishment, the statement noted.
39% : But the Air Force Inspector General investigation also found evidence that some members in Teixeira's unit, reporting chain, and leadership "had information about as many as four separate instances of his questionable activity," but failed to take action, according to an eight-page summary of the document, first reported by The Washington Post.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.