A Mechanism to Restore Liberty and Prosperity
- Bias Rating
78% Very Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
78% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-57% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : The purpose of this change is to limit the federal government only to expressly delegated powers and support a free market in energy.58% : " The purpose of this change is to define citizenship, eliminate incentives for illegal immigration and chain immigration, and require explicit recognition by immigrants of the supremacy of our Constitution.
50% : A seventh proposed amendment would state something like, "Secession by any state will be accorded if all the legislative chambers of that state each pass such a resolution by two-thirds majority vote.
49% : A fifth proposed amendment would state something like, "All Executive Orders must be submitted to Congress for passage in both houses.
48% : A third amendment would modify the Fourteenth Amendment to state, "...
48% : A fourth proposed amendment would state something like, "All new regulations must be submitted by the Executive Branch back to Congress for legislative approval by both houses of Congress under the legislative protocols used to pass the respective legislation; no further signature is required by the President.
48% : A ninth proposed amendment would change the Sixteenth Amendment by, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, with a uniform rate and a maximum rate of 10%, as applied to either individuals or corporations, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
47% : The first proposed amendment would change Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 to state, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and, as limited to the express descriptions and limitations in the subsequent clauses of this Section, general welfare of the United States; but all taxes, duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.
47% : " The purpose of this change is to cap income taxes on individuals and corporations and, commensurately, the tax on dividends and capital gains.
46% : The second proposed amendment would change Article VI, Clause 2 to state, "This Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land.
46% : An eight proposed amendment would state something like, "No special rights, privileges, or benefits shall be accorded on the basis of gender identity.
45% : A sixth proposed amendment would state something like, "The Federal Reserve will be audited every other year by the Congress culminating in publication of results.
43% : Except for corporate taxes and taxes on dividends and capital gains, Congress may not lay any taxes on energy production, generation, or use or any activity related to that use, nor shall any preferential tax credits apply.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.