Anti-racism supersedes actual medicine, endangers patients

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : Problems aside, anti-racist ideology is enforced and propagated through peer-reviewed medical journals, the information bank that journalists, judges, and lawmakers generally entrust to make sense of what "science" says about critical issues.
48% : Anti-racist screeds may be the fast-track to publication in the most prestigious journals, but patients gain nothing and stand to lose much from that ideology's conquest of medical scholarship.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.