The Hill5 takeaways from the Arizona Senate debate
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-19% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
32% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : Harris and Trump are largely polling neck and neck in the state.30% : Though an aggregate of Arizona surveys compiled by Decision Desk HQ shows a tighter race at the presidential level -- with Trump at 49 percent while Harris is at 48 percent -- DDHQ's aggregate of Arizona Senate polls shows Gallego enjoying a wider lead against Lake, 50 percent to 42 percent.
30% : Meanwhile, Gallego largely made no mention of Harris during his remarks and occasionally brought up Trump.
19% : She also sought to tie Gallego to President Biden and Vice President Harris over the issue, while aligning herself closely to Trump.
6% : Lake attacked Gallego over the topic, referencing remarks he made in 2017, for example, in which he called Trump's border wall "stupid" and "dumb."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.