A Triumphant Trump Strides Boldly Back to Butler

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

69% : I am sure Trump wanted many of them beside him, above all things.
60% : "He believes Trump "would have used it already" if he thought highlighting the shooter was to his political advantage.
51% : I don't think Trump has forgotten a single soul who stopped the bleeding, organized crowds, kept people calm - the first page of the attendee list is a testament to the American spirit in a dire situation.
43% : Crooks is the name Trump seemingly refuses to speak in public - even as he prepares to revisit the scene of the crime for the first time, with another rally in Butler, Pennsylvania scheduled for Saturday.
39% : Trump feels he has an "obligation" to finish the rally.
39% : Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania -- where he was shot in the ear by a would-be assassin, who killed a rallygoer and injured others -- will give him a spotlight for one of his rallies that has been more difficult for him to grab in recent years....and then makes sure to mention that Trump is reportedly not on his game, so it may not help him as much as the campaign hopes....
31% : Trump's going to be accompanied by an entire, totally astounding posse of folks who wanted to be with him to make the point - to drive home the message - that their madness and violence will not stop the signal.
29% : Trump will revisit the scene of his near miss with extinction for a promised make-up rally at 5 pm local time, and, honest to God, I cannot imagine how emotional it's going to be.
27% : The author notes that Trump has never mentioned the wannabe assassin's name for all that he's spoken of the attempt.
22% : The whole article distills to a butthurt reporter who can't believe he has to write something about a guy making hay about sort of nearly being whacked when he was asking for it to begin with and doing his best to find anyone who hates Trump to add their ten cents in agreement.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.