Abortion Access Will, Once Again, Be Decided by the Supreme Court

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

67% : Last year, a group of anti-abortion doctors sued the Food and Drug Administration, saying the organization had improperly approved mifepristone back in 2000.
50% : (And if Trump gets elected, he'd absolutely have on his Supreme Court shortlist a judge like James Ho, the Fifth Circuit troll who said the anti-abortion doctors have standing to sue because they like looking at pregnant patients and abortion causes them an "aesthetic injury.")In sum, the Supreme Court taking this case isn't bad news, but of course, that means we have to trust that at least five of the justices will reject the insane arguments that the plaintiffs made, and that's asking a lot.
46% : The next GOP president could ban abortion pills without this lawsuit, and without Congress, by simply enforcing the Comstock Act, a law from 1873 that's never been repealed.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.