Affirmative action unconstitutional, SCOTUS rules
- Bias Rating
-40% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-40% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-35% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : This precedent, first confirmed in 2003, acknowledged affirmative action as a necessary, corrective system to racial inequality in higher education.59% : Public universities can no longer consider race in admissions, a practice known as affirmative action, following a 6-3 decision released by the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday morning.
57% : The establishing case, however, recommended a 25-year limit on affirmative action -- a limit that would have theoretically expired in six years.
54% : Because affirmative action is related to a government entity and the consideration of race, it is subject to "strict scrutiny," the tightest level of review to prove constitutionality.
28% : Roberts wrote that affirmative action fails strict scrutiny because the goals the universities presented were not judicially meaningful and because the universities' admissions programs didn't demonstrate a meaningful connection between the "means they employ and the goals they pursue."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.