Alvin Bragg just "neutralized" possible Donald Trump witness -- ex-prosecutor
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-62% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
44% : Saying, 'Huh? Donald Trump never committed any crimes, never did anything wrong, even though I, as his chief financial officer, was involved in a 15-year-long criminal scheme to defraud during my time at the Trump Organization.'36% : Trump was indicted in March 2023 on charges of falsifying business records relating to a hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during his 2016 campaign, following an investigation by Bragg's office.
34% : Trump has appealed Engoron's judgment.
27% : On Monday, Trump, the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee, will see the start of his first criminal trial.
23% : Trump has not admitted to any wrongdoing, despite being found liable for financial fraud.
22% : Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg "neutralized" Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization's former chief financial officer, who could have acted as a defense witness for Donald Trump in the hush money case against him, a former federal prosecutor says.
13% : On his show, Kirschner explained that Weisselberg could never be called as a prosecution witness in the hush money trial "because he has never agreed to testify truthfully about the crimes of Donald Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.