An anti-obscenity law from 1873 was discarded for decades. Now the anti-choice movement wants it back | Moira Donegan

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

42% : If it is upheld, that interpretation would dramatically curtail access to abortion in Republican-controlled states, where mail-order abortion pills have served as a last resort for many women needing abortions under laws that prohibit them.
36% : This meant that Americans could be punished for mailing contraception, abortion drugs or implements, sex toys, pornography, or any information about contraception, abortion, or the prevention of venereal disease, or even personal letters with sexually suggestive content.
31% : It is the anti-choice movement's aim to remove abortion from that system of normal commerce, requiring providers to create alternative supply chairs - the same way the anti-choice movement has removed abortion from the broader system of normal medicine, requiring providers to create alternative clinics.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.