Angela Rayner opens up about growing up in poverty
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-50% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
18% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : She said she believes she would have been taken into social services today59% : Ms Rayner said in 'modern days' she and her siblings would 'definitely' have been taken into social services.
59% : Ms Rayner said in 'modern days' she and her siblings would 'definitely' have been taken into social services.
57% : The 41-year-old set out her experiences of growing up in poverty and said that in 'modern times' she 'definitely' would have been taken away by social services.
41% : Asked if she was ever in danger of being taken away by social services, Ms Rayner said: 'I think, you know what, in modern days, definitely we would have gone.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.