Another case coming to the Supreme Court could have a big impact on Trump.

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : "States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office," the majority wrote.
44% : "The Constitution makes Congress, rather than the states, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates," the majority wrote, adding that detailed federal legislation was required to determine who was disqualified under the provision.
39% : The full provision says: "No person shall be a senator or representative in Congress, or elector of president and vice president, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."It adds, "But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."The case, Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719, is not the only one concerning Mr. Trump on the Supreme Court's docket.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.