Appeals arguments set on immigrants brought to US as kids - The Boston Globe

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% :"Texas and the other states cannot point to an injury that is traceable to DACA," MALDEF attorney Nina Perales said in a news conference last week.
41% : "Texas, the lead plaintiff with eight other Republican-leaning states, argues that DACA was enacted without going through proper legal and administrative procedures, including public notice and comment periods.
41% : They argue that DACA is a policy that falls within federal authorities' power to decide how best to spend finite enforcement resources and that Texas diminished its claims of financial injury by waiting six years to challenge the program.
40% :DACA has faced numerous court challenges since then-President Barack Obama created it by executive order in 2012.
35% : Additionally, the states argue that they are harmed financially by allowing immigrants to remain in the country illegally."DACA imposes classic pocketbook injuries on the States through social services, healthcare, and education costs," Texas attorneys argued in a brief, estimating that the state spends tens of millions of dollars on Medicaid services on those in the country illegally.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.