The Seattle Times Article RatingAt trial, U.S. calls ex-D.C. police officer Proud Boys 'double agent'
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-27% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-4% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : As it turned out, Rothstein in his opening statement alleged that Lamond's turn to becoming a "double agent" for the Proud Boys began on Nov. 7, 2020, when news networks declared that Biden had defeated Trump, and that what had been a "one-way" flow of information from source to police intelligence officer became a two-way stream.41% : Stone was convicted after a jury trial before Jackson, but pardoned by Trump in December 2020.
25% : He is serving a 22-year prison sentence for seditious conspiracy after being found guilty of plotting violence to stop Congress's certification of Joe Biden's 2020 election victory over Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.