USA Today Article Rating

'Audience of one.' A look at some of Sandra Day O'Connor's biggest Supreme Court decisions

Dec 01, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    10% Center

  • Reliability

    80% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    14% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : New York v. United StatesA former state lawmaker and state judge, O'Connor was an ardent believer in the principle of federalism - keeping the roles of federal and state governments separate.
50% : Planned Parenthood v. CaseyThe landmark abortion case affirmed the central holding of Roe v. Wade, that the Constitution protected a right to an abortion.
49% : In recent years, including in two cases earlier this year, a more conservative Supreme Court has been redrawing the line separating church and state in a way that is more favorable to religious interests.
47% : McCreary County v. ACLU of KentuckyO'Connor provided the key vote in a 5-4 decision that displaying the Ten Commandments at two Kentucky courthouses violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which sets down the principle of separation between church and state.
46% : In an often-quoted concurring opinion, O'Connor wrote that, "Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly?"
43% : But, the court ruled, Congress overstepped its power with a provision of the law in which states were required to take ownership of and responsibility for radioactive waste that it couldn't dispose of through other means.
41% : The laws requirements, she wrote, would would "'commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link